The Family as an Idol
Matt. 12:50:
"For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.”
Apparently Jesus taught that our relationship as brothers and sisters is predicated upon belief in Him and the Gospel. He obviously saw no familial relationship due to some fantasy pre-mortal existence where all spirits are related by patrilineal descent (with various "mothers" providing the "venue" for new baby spirits). Relationships, according to Jesus, are defined by being born into another family, by becoming sons and daughters of God by faith.
John 1:12:
"12 But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, t
he gave the right to become children of God,"
Apparently, the Mormon false prophet is more concerned about physical descent than spiritual descent by faith in Christ. And therein lies one of the worst idols that Mormonism has set up: the physical family. Has Nelson read the Gospel of Matthew?:
Matt. 10: 21
"Brother will betray brother to death, and a father his child; children will rise against their parents and have them put to death."
Matt. 10: 35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
36 And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.
And he said to them, “Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or wife or brothers or parents or children, for the sake of the kingdom of God,
who will not receive many times more in this time, and in the age to come eternal life.”
Luke 19:29: And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or fields for the sake of My name will receive a hundredfold and will inherit eternal life.
and, Matt. 19:29: "And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or fields for my sake will receive a hundred times as much and will inherit eternal life."
There are many other verses, but these suffice to demonstrate that Jesus certainly had no Mormon attitude toward "families." He certainly never taught that it's "all about families." Neither in the Bible or the BoM is this found as a New Covenant teaching. Family-worship is an idol found in Mormonism, and in the Occult where spirit contacts with deceased family members are desired.....and many Mormons indicate they have communed with dead family members (an outgrowth of Mormon occultism).
The Bible, however, teaches us that Jesus did not recognize physical relationships as binding in any way in heaven, but rather spiritual relationships make us brothers and sisters because of faith in Jesus; furthermore, there is no marriage, or being in a matrimonial state, in the Kingdom of God:
" 29 Jesus answered them, "You are wrong, because you do not understand the Scriptures nor the power of God. 30 For after the resurrection there is no marrying or being married, but they live as angels do in heaven. 31 But as to the resurrection of the dead, did you never read what was said to you by God, 3 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob'? He is not the God of dead men but of living!" (note here is one of Jesus' clearest teachings on the condition of deceased Christians in the afterlife - they are "living.') Goodspeed
So, Jesus teaches here that humans will be like angels (not become angels), and that marital relationships do not exist as they do here on earth: "There is NO marrying or being married." This is pretty clear and only someone who is illiterate or considers Joe Smith's words as of greater importance than those of the Lord's would ever see in this passage anything to do with "eternal marriage." In Jesus' Kingdom there is no need for marriage vows since we won't be procreating as couples do on earth.
The Spirit Medium, Swedenborg, from whom Joe Smith borrowed his three heavens teaching, also taught that there were martial relationships in heaven. All these teachings, Swedenborg's and Smith's, come from demonic sources. They directly contradict the teachings of Jesus.
Where oh where does the Bible teach that it's "all about the family," as Nelson proclaims? No place in the New Covenant texts. Under the Old Covenant, relationships were reckoned by physical descent from this patriarch or that. Patrilineal descent in Judaism has now been changed to Matrilineal descent to prove one is a Jew. That says something about our decline in morality. However in the New Testament, it is one's spiritual relationship through faith in Christ which determines whether or not we are adopted into the REAL FAMILY, THE ONLY ONE THAT MATTERS, God's Family, John 1:12:
John 1: " 11 He (my note: Jesus) came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God—13 children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.
Who were "his own" that did not receive Jesus? They were the Jews to whom He was related through the flesh of Mary. The Jews, His own family members DID NOT receive Jesus. Therefore, the Bible teaches that relationship with God depends not on the fleshly relationships, but on the spiritual:
"Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God." And this was not because of natural descent, as the verses explain.
Under the Old Covenant, "natural descent" from one of the 12 Patriarchs was the means to be part of God's "Chosen People." However, under the New Covenant, natural descent is meaningless. It bestows no validity. Under the New Covenant it is FAITH IN JESUS which makes us children of God.
The useless "sealings" of parents to children performed in Mormon temples are simply without any validity, and wasted time. My children won't become Christians because of me, or anyone else. They will be saved by their OWN faith. Jesus, not blood ties, saves a person and places them in God's family. In Christ, there has been a transition from the fleshly to the spiritual, and the Mormons have apparently missed it!
Paul said that a state of singleness was preferable to marriage:
1 Cor. 7:8 " Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. "
1 Cor. 7:38 So then he who marries his betrothed does well, and he who refrains from marriage will do even better.
I think this is pretty clear, and directly opposes the Mormon false teaching about eternal marriages.
So, we have two different teachings. One from the Bible, the other from the false cult of Mormonism. Which is true?
Has the central idol of Mormonism, other than Joseph Smith, become "the family?" It's obvious that it has. And this form of idolatry is taught neither in the Bible or their Book of Mormon.
"The Scripture says that He, the LORD, came walking in the Temple, with His train; I do not know who they were, unless His wives and children ..." (Mormon 2nd Prophet & President Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, Vol. 13, p. 309)
According to the scripture above it sounds Jesus life was cut off before he could marry or have children, this verse is also quoted in the New Testament Acts 8:32
The Mormon church teaches that marriages sealed in their temples under their church’s authority continue on into eternity. Indeed, they claim that to reach the highest level of celestial glory and progress on into godhood, one must be part of an eternal marriage to be able to populate a world of your own. The Bible, however, flatly contradicts this teaching and makes it clear that marriage ends at death.
The clearest example of this is found in the words of Jesus Himself. The Sadducees sought to trap Jesus in a logical dilemma related to His teaching on the future resurrection of the dead:
“Teacher, Moses said, ‘If a man dies having no children, his brother as next of kin shall marry his wife, and raise up children for his brother.’ Now there were seven brothers with us, and the first married and died, and having no children left his wife to his brother; so also the second, and the third, down to the seventh. Last of all, the woman died. In the resurrection, therefore, whose wife of the seven will she be? For they all had married her,” (Matthew 22:23-28).
Jesus answered this challenge in a clear and straightforward manner:
“You are mistaken, not understanding the Scriptures nor the power of God. For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven,” (Matthew 22:29-30).
According to Jesus, there is no marriage in the kingdom to come. After the resurrection, we will no longer be married. Indeed, Jesus says that asking about marriage in the age to come is rooted in a fundamental misunderstanding of the Scriptures! Some Mormons object that Jesus says that we can’t get married in the age to come, which implies the need for us to get married eternally now, but that would not be an answer to the Sadducee’s challenge. Their question was specifically about a woman who was biblically married in this life under the proper, God-given priesthood authorities. Jesus’ answer to this specific objection is that the question is meaningless because no one is married after the resurrection nor will they marry again. He further makes it clear that this is the universal teaching of all Scripture and that the Sadducees were wrong because they didn’t understand those Scriptures. Marriage ends at death, and we don’t take it back up in the next life. In fact, the Apostle Paul uses this very fact about marriage to illustrate the beautiful truth of the gospel:
“For the married woman is bound by law to her husband while he is living; but if her husband dies, she is released from the law concerning the husband. So then, if while her husband is living she is joined to another man, she shall be called an adulteress; but if her husband dies, she is free from the law, so that she is not an adulteress though she is joined to another man. Therefore, my brethren, you also were made to die to the Law through the body of Christ, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God,” (Romans 7:2-4).
The fact that death permanently and irrevocably ends a marriage covenant is used to show how the death of Christ on our behalf breaks to covenantal binding of the old law and allows people to be joined by faith to Christ in the New Covenant. If marriage is not broken at death, the whole analogy breaks down and we are still bound in our sins under the weight of the law! So this is, indeed, no small matter! Marriage is a bond that is broken at death. Far from coming to make our own families our top priority and to cause them to last forever, Jesus actually said:
“Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth; I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; and a man’s enemies will be the members of his household. He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me, and he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who has found his life will lose it, and he who has lost his life for My sake will find it,” (Matthew 10:34-39).
The gospel unites us with Christ and His people forever, but it often divides households rather than binding them. That is tragic, but it’s okay. Jesus didn’t come to make our earthly families last forever. He offers us something so much better: eternal life in perfect fellowship with God and all the redeemed in the age to come.
Heaven is all about families. There's nothing but families in the most glorified part of the celestial kingdom. You cannot be exalted without a family. A defining feature of Godhood and of godhood is "eternal increase." This is defined as a kingdom which has no end, to which for both the Father and the Son the scriptures amply testify.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/liahona/1986/04/questions-and-answers/why-do-we-say-that-the-book-of-mormon-contains-the-fulness-of-the-gospel?lang=eng
DeleteCould you produce evidence from The Book of Mormon or The Bible that the teaching of Eternal Families is valid
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete